Oral order wherein the court allowed an application and the court below dismissed the main petition as not pressed.
Application allowed; reply and documents taken on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM NO. M-11106 OF 2013 (O&M) DECIDED ON : 30.05.2013
Raj Kumar @ Manak
...Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab and another
...Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI
Present : Mr. Jainainder Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. K. D. Sachdeva, Additional AG, Punjab.
Ms. Naiya Gill, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL)
CRM NO. 28405 of 2013
The application stands allowed and the reply along with documents are taken on record, subject to all just exceptions.
MAIN CASE
Learned counsel for the petitioner do not press the
present petition.
Dismissed as not pressed.
MAY 30, 2013 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE
Raj Kumar @ Manak
State of Punjab
K. C. PURI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
