Petitioner sought anticipatory bail. The court held the petition infructuous as the petitioner was already arrested and investigation concluded with report submission. Petition dismissed.
Petition dismissed as it has become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M-12158 of 2013 Date of Decision:- 03.09.2013
Shashi Kumar
.....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Nemo for the petitioner.
Mr. Sagar Deswal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana for the State.
MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR , J.(oral)
At the very outset, on instructions from SI Rajinder Singh, learned State Counsel, has submitted that since the petitioner has already been arrested and after completion of the investigation, the final police report (challan) has already been submitted in the trial Court, so, the present petition for anticipatory bail has becomes infructuous.
In this view of the matter, the instant petition is dismissed, as
having become infructuous, as prayed for.
September 03, 2013 ( M EHINDER S INGH S ULLAR) naresh.k JUDGE
Kumar Naresh 2013.09.06 15:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for anticipatory bail is maintainable after the petitioner has been arrested and the final report submitted.
Shashi Kumar
State of Haryana
Mehender Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
