Disposed
Suraj Kumar v. State of Punjab
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/10181/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-10181 of 2013 (O&M). Date of decision: May 30, 2013.
Suraj Kumar
..... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
..... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI
PRESENT Mr.Naveen Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Ankur Jain, AAG., Punjab.
M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL)
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition
has become infructuous.
Disposed of as having rendered infructuous.
(M.M.S. BEDI)w
May 30, 2013. rka
JUDGE
Suraj Kumar
State of Punjab
M.M.S. Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court