The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous petition. The respondent counsel submitted that the underlying complaint had been withdrawn. The court held the petition to be infructuous and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-11688 of 2013 Date of decision: 20.11.2013.
Rana Gurjit Singh
..Petitioner
Versus
Punjab State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd.
..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. I.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the respondent.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the respondent on instructions from
Mr. Jagatjit Singh, General Manager, PSIDC, submits that the
complaint qua to present petitioner has been withdrawn.
In view of the submission made by learned counsel for
the respondent, the present petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as having become infructuous.
20.11.2013 neetu
(DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
Rani Neetu 2013.11.21 13:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Rana Gurjit Singh
Punjab State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd.
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
