Rajinder Kuamr v. Haropinder Singh and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a revision petition challenging the eviction of a tenant by the landlord on the ground of personal necessity. The Court upheld the findings that the landlord’s requirement to run a business is bonafide and that alleged vacancies in other shops are either unfit for habitation or do not belong to the landlord, noting that replication cured any pleading defects.
What did the court decide?
Dismissal of the revision petition and affirmation of the eviction order.