Dismissed

Gurcharan Singh Aneja v. Dharambir Tondon

Punjab & Haryana HC14 Aug 2013CR/100/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition against an eviction order based on the landlord's personal necessity. The Court admitted the tenant to vacate within nine months, subject to payment of rent and filing of an undertaking.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal of petition; grant of nine months (until 13.05.2014) to hand over vacant possession on payment of rent and filing of undertaking.

Gurcharan Singh Aneja Vs Dharambir Tondon — Landlord and Tenant | Punjab & Haryana HC (2013)

¶1

�� 

¶2

�� !"#� Date of decision: 14^th August, 2013

¶3

Gurcharan Singh Aneja

� Petitioner

Versus

Dharambir Tondon

� Respondent

��"$��%�&��"��'��(�'��(�"��

¶9

Present: Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. B.B.S. Randhawa, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶10

Mr. M.P.S. Mann, Advocate for the respondent.

¶11

��(�'��(�"��)�� &#�

¶12

Petitioner+tenant and the respondent+landlord are present in

¶13

Court along with their counsels.

¶14

This is tenant’s revision petition, challenging the order dated 28.10.2011 of the Rent Controller, Chandigarh, whereby his eviction has been ordered from the demised premises on the ground of ��  need of the respondent+landlord and the judgment dated 15.11.2012 of the Appellate Authority, Chandigarh, dismissing his appeal against the order of eviction passed by the Rent Controller.

¶15

The Courts below, on appreciation of the evidence on record, have recorded a concurrent finding that the respondent+landlord requires the demised premises for his �� personal necessity.

¶16

Even before this Court, learned counsel for the petitioner has remained unsuccessful to challenge the aforesaid findings by pointing out any material irregularities.

¶17

Singh Rattan Pal 2013.08.19 18:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

¶18

¶19

��

¶20

Faced with the aforesaid situation, counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is ready to hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent+landlord, if sufficient time is given to him.

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner who is present in Court, has further stated that the petitioner shall pay usual monthly rent upto the date of handing over of the vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent+landlord as charges for the use and occupation of the same. Learned counsel has further stated that the petitioner shall hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent+landlord on or before the expiry of the time granted by this Court. He further stated that the petitioner shall file an undertaking before the Rent Controller in this regard.

¶22

Thus, keeping in view the submissions made, the revision petition is dismissed, on merits. However, the petitioner is granted nine months’ time, i.e. upto 13.05.2014, to hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent+landlord, subject to payment of rent etc., as stated above and also furnishing of an undertaking of the petitioner before the Rent Controller within one month from today to hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises on or before the expiry of the stipulated period i.e. upto 13.05.2014.

¶23

Singh Rattan Pal 2013.08.19 18:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

¶24

¶25

��

¶26

It is made clear that the petitioner shall be bound by the submissions made on his behalf by his counsel before this Court.

¶27

In case of non+compliance of the order passed by this Court, the petitioner shall also be liable for initiation of contempt proceedings for contempt of this Court in addition to the execution of the eviction order.

¶28

� ��(�'��(�"��#� ��

¶29

�+�,��-)�� ��

¶30

Singh Rattan Pal 2013.08.19 18:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

Gurcharan Singh Aneja v. Dharambir Tondon

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gurcharan Singh Aneja v. Dharambir Tondon

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahabir Parshad Garg Vs Mahabir Parshad and Anr.

M/S Navneet & Company & Anr. Vs Ishwar Garg & Ors.

Gian Chand Vs Bharat Lal and Others

Gurcharan Singh Vs Dharambir Tondon

Rajinder Kuamr Vs Haropinder Singh and Ors.

Ramandeep Singh Vs Gurmit Kaur and Ors.