Justice Jaswant Singh dismissed a revision petition filed by advocates against an order dismissing their application to prevent another advocate from representing the decree holder. The petitioners withdrew the review on the day of hearing. The court dismissed the matter as withdrawn.
Revision petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CR 6248/2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR 6248/2013 Date of decision:10/10/2013
Janki Dass Jain and others
.............Petitioners
v.
Neeraj Kumar Pathak and another
.............Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH
Present:Mr.Kanwaljit Singh,Senior Advocate assisted by Mr.Sandeep Jain,Advocate for the petitioners.
Jaswant Singh,J.(Oral)
The petitioners who are Advocates are in revision aggrieved against the order dated 21.9.2013 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Div.)SBS Nagar (Nawanshahar) whereby their application for not permitting any other Advocate to represent the decree holder, has been dismissed.
At the time of hearing, learned counsel very graciously
prays for withdrawal of the revision petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
10.10.2013. joshi
(Jaswant Singh) Judge
Joshi Rajinder Prashad 2013.10.10 16:35 I attest to the accuracy of this Order. High Court, Chandigarh.
Janki Dass Jain and others
Neeraj Kumar Pathak and another
Jaswant Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
