The civil revision petition was disposed of as having become infructuous, indicating that the underlying proceedings had concluded or become without merit, rendering further adjudication unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R. No. 2001 of 2011 Date of decision:-25.09.2013
Narender Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
M/s Sohan Lal and Company and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
Present:Mr. Amit Kashyap, Advocate for Mr. Rajender Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Kanhiya Soni, Advocate Mr. Arun Bansal, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2.
K. KANNAN J.(Oral)
Counsel says that the civil revision petition has been
rendered infructuous.
Same is disposed of as having become infructuous.
September 25, 2013 ( K. KANNAN ) Vijay Asija JUDGE
Asija Vijay 2013.09.27 12:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court,Chandigarh
Narender Singh
M/s Sohan Lal and Company and another
K. Kannan
Vijay Asija
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
