Dismissed
Madho Ram v. Harmohinder Singh
Punjab & Haryana HCCOCP/530/1993
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.530 of 1993 Date of Decision. 24.09.2013
Madho Ram (since deceased) through LRs
.......Petitioner
Versus
Harmohiner Singh and others
......Respondents
Present: Mr. O.P. Goyal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Varun Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Anshuman Chopra, Advocate for Mr. Amarjit Markan, Advocate for respondent No.2.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
K. KANNAN J. (ORAL)
the contempt petition.
(K. KANNAN) JUDGE
September 24, 2013 Pankaj*
Kamboj Pankaj Kumar 2013.10.01 10:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Madho Ram (since deceased) through LRs
Harmohiner Singh and others
K. KANNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court