A civil revision petition was dismissed as against the impugned order of the trial court dated 08.02.2013, with the observation that the order did not suffer from any illegality, irregularity, or perversity and therefore required no interference by this Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No. 1906 of 2013
Date of decision: March 20, 2013
Gurpreet Singh
.. Petitioner
Vs.
Davinder Kaur and others
.. Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal
Present: Mr. Ashok Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.
A.N. Jindal, J
The petitioner has sought to set aside the order dated 8.2.2013 (Annexure P/1) passed by the trial court.
Having examined the impugned order, the same does not suffer from any illegality much less irregularity or perversity warranting interference by this Court.
No merits.
Dismissed.
March 20, 2013 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge
Gurpreet Singh
Davinder Kaur and others
A.N. Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
