The Supreme Court Civil Petition was disposed of when the petitioner withdrew the plea as having become infructuous after endorsing a specific statement recorded earlier.
Petition withdrawn as infructuous and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
CP No. 91 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 16th January, 2013.
Harmohan Manchanda Petitioner through Ms. Ishat Kaur, Advocate
Versus
Maxtel Infosystems P.Ltd. Respondent through Mr. Umang Bansal, Advocate.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT.
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL]
While endorsing the statement as recorded on
25.07.2012, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks and is permitted
to withdraw this petition as having become infructuous.
Disposed of. Dasti .
January 16, 2013. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE
Harmohan Manchanda
Maxtel Infosystems P.Ltd.
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
