The court held that the petition had become infructuous following compliance of a previous order by DPI (Secondary Education), Punjab, and disposed of the matter without prejudice to rights to challenge a subsequent order. A thin order with no substantive legal discussion.
Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Raj Kumar Arora 2013.09.05 15:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-932-2013 (O&M). Decided on: September 2, 2013.
Karamjit Kaur
..... Petitioner
Versus
Anjli Bhawra and another
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI
PRESENT Mr.Kapil Kakkar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Anant Kataria, AAG., Punjab.
M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL)
Order dated 9.7.2013, as per the reply filed by the DPI (Secondary Education), Punjab, which has been placed on record today in the Court, has been complied with.
Without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to challenge the legality of order dated 23.8.2013, this petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous .
(M.M.S. BEDI)
September 2, 2013. JUDGE rka
Karamjit Kaur
Anjli Bhawra
M.M.S. BEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
