Petitioner disposed of a writ petition as their execution petition was paid, rendering it infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Raj Kumar Arora 2013.10.30 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-2864-2012 (O&M). Decided on: October 28, 2013.
Surjeet Kaur
..... Petitioner
Versus
Tulsi Ram and others
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI
PRESENT Mr.K.S.Dadwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.R.D.Sharma, DAG., Haryana.
Mr.R.K.Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL)
Payment having already been made in execution,
this petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous.
(M.M.S. BEDI)
October 28, 2013. rka
JUDGE
Surjeet Kaur
Tulsi Ram
M.M.S. BEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
