Prem Singh v. Anil Dhawan
Case brief
What is this about?
Court disposed of petitioner's petition as infructuous due to an order initiating reinvestigation of the FIR.
Court disposed of petitioner's petition as infructuous due to an order initiating reinvestigation of the FIR.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Raj Kumar Arora 2013.10.30 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-2506-2013 (O&M). Decided on: October 28, 2013.
Prem Singh
..... Petitioner
Versus
Anil Dhawan
..... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI
PRESENT Mr.Aashish Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.R.D.Sharma, DAG., Haryana.
M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL)
In view of order dated 18.7.2013, indicating that reinvestigation of the FIR registered at the instance of the petitioner has been ordered, this petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous without prejudice to the other legal rights of the petitioner.
October 28, 2013. rka
(M.M.S. BEDI) JUDGE
Prem Singh
Anil Dhawan
M.M.S. BEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court