Single judge allowed the miscellaneous application for withdrawal of a contempt petition. The hearing date was preponed and the case disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive legal issue was decided.
The miscellaneous application for withdrawal of the contempt petition was allowed and the case disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Raj Kumar Arora 2013.09.05 09:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CM-18230-CII-2013 in/and COCP-2250-2013. Decided on: September 3, 2013.
Raj Kumar Gupta
..... Petitioner
Versus
Ashok Kumar Gupta and others
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI
PRESENT Mr.R.K.Girdhar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL)
CM-18230-CII-2013
This misc. application is for withdrawal of contempt
petition.
Misc. application is allowed. The date of hearing is preponed from 27.9.2013 to today.
COCP-2250-2013
Disposed of as withdrawn.
(M.M.S. BEDI)
September 3, 2013. rka
JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the withdrawal of the contempt petition.
Raj Kumar Gupta
Ashok Kumar Gupta
M.M.S. Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
