Court noted compliance with a previous speaking order dated March 14, 2013. Petitioner informed they can avail other legal remedies if dissatisfied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
COCP No. 1689 of 2013
[1]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH.
COCP No. 1689 of 2013
Date of Decision: September 10, 2013
Sohan Lal and others
…..Petitioners
Vs.
Ashok Kumar Gupta and others
…..Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI.
-.-
Present:Mr.Peeush Gagneja, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Anant Kataria, AAG, Punjab.
Mr.Vishwajit Bedi, Advocate
Ms.Suneeta Kaushal, Advocate.
-.-
M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL)
It is agreed by counsel for both the parties that the order dated March 14, 2013 passed by this Court has been complied with by passing a speaking order.
In case the petitioner is still not satisfied with the relief granted, it will be open to the petitioner to avail any other legal remedy available to the petitioner in accordance with law.
Gupta Sanjay 2013.09.11 14:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
COCP No. 1689 of 2013
[2]
September 10, 2013 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE
Gupta Sanjay 2013.09.11 14:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Sohan Lal and others
Ashok Kumar Gupta and others
M.M.S. BEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
