This is a thin order where the learned State Counsel submitted compliance with an order dated 2.4.2013, satisfying the court and counsel for the petitioners.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; Rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.O.C.P. No.1374 of 2013
Date of Decision:05.07.2013
Sant Ram and others
.....Petitioners
Vs.
Sh. Varun Roojam
.....Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present:Mr. Deepak Verma, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. A.P.S. Mann, Addl. AG, Punjab.
Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (Oral)
Learned State Counsel submits that order dated 2.4.2013 has
been complied with.
This satisfies the counsel for the the petitioners and he prays for withdrawal of the petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
Rule discharged.
July 05, 2013 ( RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ) renu JUDGE
Sant Ram and others
Sh. Varun Roojam
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
