Dismissed

Punjab State Industrial Development Corp. Ltd. v. M/S Nikita Media Services and Anr.

Punjab & Haryana HC10 Apr 2013CAPP/12/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by a secured creditor challenging the order directing it to pay advertisement expenses to a running official liquidator. The court held the creditor must pay but can later claim recovery from liquidated assets.

What did the court decide?

Appellant to deposit the amount within four weeks and claim publication charges as sale expenses from the assets.

Punjab State Industrial Development Corp. Ltd… — Specific Performance | Punjab & Haryana HC (2013)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Date of decision: 10.04.2013 CAPP No. 12 of 2013 (O&M)

¶3

Punjab State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd.

¶4

......Appellant.

¶5

vs.

¶6

M/s Nikita Media Services and another

¶7

.....Respondents.

¶8

CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

¶9

Present: - Mr. B.S. Walia, Advocate for the appellant.

¶10

Hemant Gupta, J

¶11

Present appeal is directed against an order passed by the Company Court on 31.1.2013 whereby the appellant has been directed to pay a sum of Rs. 15,01,661/- towards the expenses of advertisement published for the sale of assets of the Company-inLiquidation.

¶12

The advertisements were got published by the Official Liquidator through the advertising agency i.e. M/s Nikita Media Services who has raised a bill of Rs. 49,57,655/-. In CP No. 19 of 2009, Punjab State Industrial Development Corporation Limited vs. Punjab National Fertilizer and Chemicals Limited and ors, the said expenses were ordered to be paid by the Official Liquidator but the Official Liquidator was also directed to take action against such persons who are found responsible for the publication of advertisement at a market rate than at the rates prescribed for Directorate of Audio Video Publicity (DAVP).

¶13

-2-

¶14

The grievance of the appellant is that it is the Official Liquidator who has to realize the excess amount from the persons who are responsible for the publication of the advertisement rather than the appellant who is the secured creditor.

¶15

We do not find any merit in the said argument raised by the learned counsel for the appellant. The Official Liquidator has been directed to take action against such persons who are found liable for publication of the advertisement which may include the recovery of the excess amount but it does not absolve the appellant as a secured creditor to defray the publication expenses to the Official Liquidator.

¶16

In view of the said fact, we do not find any merit in the present appeal.

¶17

Dismissed. However, it shall be open to the appellant to claim publication charges as sale expenses from the assets of the Company. The appellant may deposit the amount within a period of four weeks from today.

¶18

(HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE

¶19

10.04.2013 preeti

¶20

(RITU BAHRI) JUDGE

Punjab State Industrial Development Corp. Ltd. v. M/S Nikita Media Services and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Punjab State Industrial Development Corp. Ltd. v. M/S Nikita Media Services and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Seema Tulisan Vs India Housing Finance Ltd.

Subash Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Krishan Kumar and Anr. Vs Icici Bank Home Finance Co. Ltd. and Ors.

Punjab State Industrial Dev. Corpn. Ltd. Vs M/S Punjab National Fertilizer and Chemicals Ltd.

M/S Bassi Steels Limioted and Anr. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise and Anr.

Amandeep Singh Vs State of Punjab