In two writ petitions, this Court dismissed a challenge to the Excise Policy regarding liquor vends due to lack of cause of action and dismissed another petition upon withdrawal.
The writ petition challenging the Excise Policy was dismissed. The subsequent writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision: April 09, 2013 CWP No. 25016 of 2012
Subhash
…Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
…Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present: Mr.Vivek Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Mamta Singhal Talwar, AAG, Haryana
HEMANT GUPTA, J.
Challenge in the writ petition is to the Excise Policy contemplating opening of the liquor vends in contravention of the guidelines.
Since the excise year has come to an end and new liquor vends licensed, we do not find that the petitioner has necessary cause of action.
Dismissed.
(HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE
(RITU BAHRI) JUDGE
09.04.2013 Atul
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision: April 09, 2013 CWP No. 6268 of 2013
Subhash
…Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
…Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present: Mr.Vivek Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Mamta Singhal Talwar, AAG, Haryana
HEMANT GUPTA, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw
the present writ petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE
(RITU BAHRI) JUDGE
09.04.2013 Atul
Subhash
State of Haryana
Hemant Gupta
Ritu Bahri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
