This order allowed a compromise application to withdraw a regular recall/regular appeal. Subsequently, the main appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
*** * * * * RSA No.2744 of 2009 (O&M)** Date of decision : March 23, 2012
Nathu Ram
............Appellant
Versus
Dr. Nidhi Sanduja
...........Respondent
Present: Mr. C.B Goel, Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Gupta, Advocate for the applicant-appellant.
C.M No.3599-C of 2012
This is an application under Order 23 Rule 1 read with Section 151 CPC moved by the applicant-appellant seeking to withdraw the main appeal.
Prayer made in the application is allowed.
C.M is disposed of accordingly.
RSA No.2744 of 2009
In the light of the application bearing C.M No.3599-C of 2012 coupled with the statement made by the learned counsel for the appellant that he wishes to withdraw the main appeal as the matter has been compromised, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
March 23, 2012 ( TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA ) ritu JUDGE
Nathu Ram
Dr. Nidhi Sanduja
TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
