This court dismissed an appeal for non-prosecution as the appellants failed to appear on hearing dates and were deemed not interested in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CASE NO: RSA No.2623 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 22, 2012
Ved Singh and others
...Appellants
VERSUS
Kumari Munni and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA
Present: None.
TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J.(ORAL)
The case has been called up twice. There is no representation on behalf of the appellants. It is noticed that on the previous dates i.e. 09.08.2011, 04.05.2011 as also on 01.11.2010, none had appeared. It is obvious that the appellant in not interested to pursue the present appeal.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
March 22, 2012 (TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA) Vgulati JUDGE
Ved Singh and others
Kumari Munni and another
Tejinder Singh Dhindsa
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
