A miscellaneous order dismissing a petition without recorded reasons, directing reference to a separate detailed order. No substantive legal proposition derived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No. 4347 of 2003 (O&M) LAC No. 189 of 2000
Gurpal Singh and others
....Appellants
Versus
State of Punjab
......Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. Naresh Kaushal, Advocate for the landowners.
Mr. Yatinder Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
RAJESH BINDAL, J
For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order
passed today in R.F.A. No. 2110 of 2001, titled as Gurcharan Singh and
another Vs. Punjab State.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
07.03.2012
sharmila
Gurpal Singh and others
State of Punjab
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
