Order dismissing application without detailed reasons, deferring to a separate judgment in a connected revision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No. 1453 of 2012 (O&M)
Jaibeer
.... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. Ajay Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. D.D. Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.
RAJESH BINDAL, J
For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order
passed today in Civil Revision No.1451 of 2012, titled as Chandi Ram Vs.
State of Haryana and others.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
06.03.2012
sharmila
Jaibeer
State of Haryana
RAJESH BINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
