The reference to a separate order number (R.F.A. No. 2110 of 2001) indicates that the substantive reasons are contained in that distinct order. This short text itself contains no operative decision, legal principle, or summary of the law to be cited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
R.F.A. No.4258 of 2003 (O&M)
(L.A.C. No.160 of 1999)
Sadhu Singh and others
...... Appellants
Versus
State of Punjab
.... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. Naresh Kaushal, Advocate for the land owners.
Mr. Yatinder Sharma, DAG, Punjab.
RAJESH BINDAL J.
For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order
passed today in R.F.A. No. 2110 of 2001, titled as Gurcharan Singh and
another Vs. Punjab State.
07.03.2012
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
sarita
Sadhu Singh and others
State of Punjab
RAJESH BINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
