The court disposed of R.F.A. No.39 of 2011 by referring skilled reasons recorded in a separate order passed on the same date regarding a similar land revenue matter; no substantive legal reasoning is provided here.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
R.F.A. No.39 of 2011 (O&M)
(L.A.C. No.246 of 2008)
State of Haryana and another
...... Appellants
Versus
Rakma and others
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. H.S. Hooda, Advocate General, Haryana with Mr. D.D. Gupta, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana and Mr. Ashish Gupta, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana.
Mr. Ashwani Kumar Bura, Advocate for the land owners.
RAJESH BINDAL J.
For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order passed today in R.F.A. No. 1714 of 2009, titled as State of Haryana and another Vs. Pala Ram and others.
01.05.2012
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
sarita
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Haryana and another Vs. Pala Ram and othersReferred¶13
R.F.A. No. 1714 of 2009
State of Haryana and another
Rakma and others
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
