State of Haryana v. Ronki and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
This order remits a detailed decision to a separate judgment (R.F.A. No. 1714 of 2009 State of Haryana vs. Pala Ram and others) and contains no substantive reasoning, findings, or specific legal proposition.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
R.F.A. No.362 of 2011 (O&M)
(L.A.C. No.183 of 2008)
State of Haryana and others
...... Appellants
Versus
Ronki
.... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. H.S. Hooda, Advocate General, Haryana with Mr. D.D. Gupta, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana and Mr. Ashish Gupta, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana.
None for the land owner.
RAJESH BINDAL J.
For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order passed today in R.F.A. No. 1714 of 2009, titled as State of Haryana and another Vs. Pala Ram and others.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State of Haryana and others
- respondent
Ronki
Coram
Rajesh Bindal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- RFA/362/2011
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court