Disposed
Mahabir & Others v. State of Haryana
Punjab & Haryana HCRFA/163/1993
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No.163 of 1993(O&M) Date of Decision: 06.09.2012
Mahabir son of Mangal Singh son of Chuni Lal, Ahir, resident and Biswadar of village, Partal, Tehsil and District Mahendergarh and another.
... Appellants
Versus
Haryana Govt. through Chief Secretary Govt. of Haryana, Chandigarh and others.
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
Mr. D.D. Gupta, Addl. AG, Haryana and Mr. Ashish Gupta, AAG, Haryana.
K. KANNAN, J. (Oral)
For detailed order, see RFA No.131 of 1993 titled as
Mata Din v. Haryana State and others of even date.
6th September, 2012 ( K. KANNAN Rajan JUDGE
( K. KANNAN )
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Mata Din v. Haryana State and othersReferred
RFA No.131 of 1993
Mahabir son of Mangal Singh
Haryana Govt.
K. KANNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court