Matadin v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No.132 of 1993(O&M) Date of Decision: 06.09.2012
Sheo Karan son of Ganga Dutt son of Prana, resident and Biswadar of village, Partal, Tehsil and District Mahendergarh.
... Appellant
Versus
Haryana Govt. through Chief Secretary Govt. of Haryana, Chandigarh and others.
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
- Present:Mr. Sanjay Mittal, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. D.D. Gupta, Addl. AG, Haryana and Mr. Ashish Gupta, AAG, Haryana.
- 1.Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? NO
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sheo Karan
- respondent
Haryana Govt.
Coram
K. Kannan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- RFA/132/1993
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court