services were terminated on 31.05.1998. Petitioner challenged the termination order before the Labour Court by way of reference, which was decided in favour of the petitioner vide Award dated 11.10.2002, wherein an order of reinstatement of the petitioner with continuity of service and 50% back wages was passed. The State of Haryana challenged the said Award before this Court by filing a writ petition, which was dismissed on 21.08.2004 and the SLP preferred by the State has also been dismissed by the Supreme Court on 06.07.2010. On decision of the Supreme Court, petitioner was taken back in service on 17.08.2010 and has been granted continuity of service from the date of his initial appointment but the petitioner has not been granted the benefit of regularization of the services despite the persons, who were appointed subsequent to the petitioner and were thus, junior to the petitioner, having been regularized. Claiming the benefit of regularization, petitioner has served a legal notice dated 20.04.2012 (Annexure P-7) but till date, no decision thereon has been taken or conveyed to the petitioner. Counsel contends that the claim of the petitioner is covered by a judgment of this Court in CWP No. 5848 of 2011 titled as Karamvir Singh vs. State of Haryana and others , decided on 11.01.2012 (Annexure P-8). Petitioner is thus, entitled to regularization of the services.
