A civil writ petition was withdrawn with liberty to seek adjudication regarding whether land classified as Jumla Mushtarka Malkan vested in the Gram Panchayat due to lack of common purpose during consolidation.
Petition withdrawn with liberty to seek adjudication on the vesting of Jumla Mushtarka Malkan land.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.9312 of 2012 Date of Decision:17.05.2012
Kansi Ram and others ..... Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present : Mr.Kamal Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.
RAJIVE BHALLA, J. (ORAL)
After addressing arguments for some time, counsel for the petitioners prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to the petitioners to seek adjudication of their plea that the land, though Jumla Mushtarka Malkan , does not vest in the Gram Panchayat as it was not earmarked for any common purpose during consolidation.
Allowed as prayed for.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforestated liberty.
[ RAJIVE BHALLA ] JUDGE
17.05.2012 [ RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ] shamsher JUDGE
Kansi Ram and others
State of Haryana and others
Rajive Bhalla
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
