The Court dismissed the writ petition as premature because the petitioner's reply to the proposed demolition notice was still pending adjudication before the competent Nagar Panchayat authority.
Writ petition dismissed as pre-mature; authority to take appropriate action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.9032 of 2012 Date of Decision:17.05.2012
Nirmla Devi
..... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another ..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present : Mr.Harish Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner.
RAJIVE BHALLA, J. (ORAL)
As the petitioner's reply to the proposed demolition notice is pending adjudication before the Nagar Panchayat, Dirba, Tehsil Suman, District Sangrur, respondent No.2, we dismiss the writ petition as pre-mature. The authority concerned shall take appropriate action in
accordance with law.
[ RAJIVE BHALLA ] JUDGE
17.05.2012 [ RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ] shamsher JUDGE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition regarding the proposed demolition notice is premature given pending adjudication before the Nagar Panchayat.
What is the appropriate course of action regarding the pending reply by the petitioner.
Nirmla Devi
State of Punjab
Rajive Bhalla
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
