The High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside a Common Writ Petition as infructuous because a notification inviting applications from the oustees had been published, rendering the petition unnecessary.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 8971 of 2011 Date of decision: 17.1.2012
Krishan and ors
…..Petitioners
vs.
State of Haryana and ors
…..Respondents
CORAM: -HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL
Present: - Mr. S.P.Khatri, Advocate for the petitioners.
Ms. Palika Monga, DAG, Haryana for respondent No. 1.
Mr. Manish Bansal, Advocate for respondents No. 2 to 4.
HEMANT GUPTA, J
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the notification has been published inviting applications from the oustees such as the petitioners.
Dismissed as infructuous.
(HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE
(A.N.JINDAL) JUDGE
17.1.2012 preeti
Krishan and ors
State of Haryana and ors
Hemant Gupta
A.N. Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
