Court disposed of CWP by identical terms to a related petition previously decided by the same bench on the same issue.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.17032 of 2010 Date of decision : 17.01.2012
Satish Kumar
....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) through its Chief Administrator, HUDA Office Complex, C-3, Sector 6, Panchkula and others.
....RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL
Present : Mr.Umesh Narang, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Gitish Bhardwaj, Advocate, for Mr.Arun Walia, Advocate, for the respondents.
HEMANT GUPTA, J
Learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that issue involved in the present petition is the same issue as involved in CWP No.15065 of 2010 titled “Amarnath versus HUDA & others”.
In view of the said fact, the present petition is disposed of in the same terms as in the aforesaid writ petition.
(HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE
(A.N.JINDAL) JUDGE
17.01.2012 MAMTA
Satish Kumar
Haryana Urban Development Authority
Hemant Gupta
A.N. Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
