The single-judge bench held that the writ petition is infructuous and disposed of the matter accordingly.
Writ petition disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 8789 of 1992 Date of decision February 23, 2012
Miss Puja Ahluwalia
....... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Punjab and others
........ Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
Present:Mr. Girish Agnihotri, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vijay Pal, Advocate and Mr. Arvind Seth, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. S. S. Sahu, AAG., Punjab. Mr. Amit Seth, Advocate for Mr. J. S. Sethi, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 and 4.
K. Kannan, J (oral).
writ petition has become infructuous. The same be disposed of as such.
rendered infructuous.
(K. KANNAN) JUDGE
February 23, 2012 archana
Miss Puja Ahluwalia
The State of Punjab and others
K. Kannan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
