Appealant counsel stated that the appellants did not wish to press the second appeal; the court accordingly dismissed the appeal as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Regular Second Appeal No.2918 of 1985 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.02.2012
Maman Singh and others
...Appellants
versus
Parmeshwari Devi widow of Balwant Singh son of Moola, resident of Bhainswal Kalan Bawla, presently residing at Village Bohar, Tehsil and District Rohtak.
....Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA
Present: Mr. Kabir Sarin, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Pankaj Mulwani, Advocate, for the respondents.
Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J. (Oral)
A statement has been made at the bar by the learned counsel
for the appellants that the appellants do not wish to press the second appeal.
In the light of the statement made by the learned counsel for the appellants, the present regular second appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
February 22, 2012 (TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA) sanjeev JUDGE
Maman Singh and others
Parmeshwari Devi
Tejinder Singh Dhindsa
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
