The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the writ petition as infructuous and for non-prosecution, as no advocates appeared on behalf of the petitioners while the State was represented.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.8212 of 1988 Date of decision:15.10.2012
Shri Raj Guru and others
...Petitioners
Vs.
The State of Punjab and another
...Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K.Sikri, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. H.S.Sidhu, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
A.K.Sikri, CJ. (Oral)
It appears that the issue raised in this petition is rendered infructuous and that may be the reason that nobody has appeared on behalf of the petitioners.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(A.K.Sikri)
Chief Justice
15.10.2012 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) vinod* Judge
Shri Raj Guru and others
The State of Punjab and another
A.K.Sikri
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
