Petitioner's Writ Petition was declared infructuous by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana and disposed of by the Chief Justice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.7883 of 1992 Date of decision:15.10.2012
Sham Lal
...Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Punjab and another
...Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K.Sikri, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain
Present: Ms. Surbhi Jain, Advocate, for Mr. Ravi Kapoor, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. H.S.Sidhu, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
Mr. Anil Malhotra, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
A.K.Sikri, CJ. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the parties concede that this petition has
become infructuous.
Disposed of as such.
(A.K.Sikri)
Chief Justice
15.10.2012 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) vinod* Judge
Sham Lal
The State of Punjab
another
A.K. Sikri
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
