The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed withdrawal prayers in connected writ petitions, permitting the main petition to be taken on board and withdrawn. The Additional Advocate General had no objection.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition; main writ petition taken on board.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CM No. 9218-20 of 2012 and C.W.P. No. 4020 of 2006 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.8.2012
Ram Lal
.. Petitioner
v.
State of Punjab and others
.. Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. Mandeep K. Sajjan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Rajesh Bindal J.
Prayer in the application is for permitting the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition.
Notice in the applications to Advocate General, Punjab.
Mr. Satish Bhanot, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab, who is present in court, accepts notice. He has no objection to the prayer being granted.
The applications are allowed. The main writ petition is taken on Board and is permitted to be withdrawn.
( Rajesh Bindal ) Judge
27.8.2012 mk
Ram Lal
State of Punjab
others
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
