The respondent court held that a writ petition challenging a service issue had become infructuous because the petitioner was reinstated in service and allowed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CM No. 10615 of 2012 and C.W.P. No. 12671 of 2007 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.8.2012
Major Singh
.. Petitioner
v.
Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee
.. Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Ms. Vanita Sapra Kataria, Advocate for the petitioner.
Rajesh Bindal J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner having been reinstated back in service, the prayer in the writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
The application is allowed. The writ petition is taken on Board and is dismissed as infructuous.
( Rajesh Bindal ) Judge
27.8.2012 mk
Major Singh
Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
