Jan Kalya Samiti, Sonepat v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition. The court allowed the withdrawal.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed.
Petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition. The court allowed the withdrawal.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Civil Writ Petition No. 336 of 2011 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 12.9.2012
Jan Kalyan Samiti, Sonepat
... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and Others
... Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jasbir Singh, Acting Chief Justice. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain.
Present: Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. B.S. Rana, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Raman B. Garg, Advocate for respondent No.3.
Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arvind Singh,m Advocate for respondent No.4.
Jasbir Singh, Acting Chief Justice (Oral)
Counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw this writ petition.
Ordered accordingly.
(Jasbir Singh) Acting Chief Justice
(Rakesh Kumar Jain) Judge
September 12, 2012 “DK”
Jan Kalyan Samiti, Sonepat
State of Haryana
Jasbir Singh
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court