Petitioner's public interest litigation seeking quashing of impugned orders was allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to approach concerned authorities or avail alternate remedies.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty to petitioner to approach concerned authorities or avail alternate remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.20935 of 2012 (O & M) Date of Decision: October 17, 2012
Manmohan Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
Punjab Khadi and Village Industries Board through its Member Secretary and others
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. Surjit Singh Salar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.
The petitioner has approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of letters dated 27th December, 2010 (Annexure P-2) and 23rd September, 2011 (Annexure P-3) issued by respondent No.1.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
(G.S. SANDHAWALIA) JUDGE
October 17, 2012 Sukhpreet
Manmohan Singh
Punjab Khadi and Village Industries Board through its Member Secretary and others
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
G.S. SANDHAWALIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
