Matter disposed as infructuous due to closure of the unit following termination of mining operations.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.1976 of 2011
DATE OF DECISION: August 16, 2012
Zile Singh and another
…..Petitioners
versus
State of Haryana and others
.....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, JUDGE
Present: Mr.Rajbir Sehrawat, Advocate for petitioner No.2
Mr.Anupam Gupta, Senior Advocate-Amicus Curiae with Mr.Jashandeep Singh, Advocate
Mr.B.S. Rana, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana
..
JASBIR SINGH, ACJ: (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that on account
of closure of the unit after termination of mining operations, this
petition has become infructuous.
Disposed of accordingly.
( JASBIR SINGH ) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
August 16, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) pc JUDGE
Zile Singh and another
State of Haryana and others
JASBIR SINGH
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
