The petitioner was absent and placed no instructions with counsel. The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.18998 OF 2010 DATE OF DECISION: NOVEMBER 08, 2012
Sukhblas Singh
.....Petitioner
VERSUS
Financial Commissioner (Appeals-I), Punjab, Chandigarh and others
....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH
Present: Ms. Sudesh Sahi, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Punchhi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Munisha Gandhi, Addl.A.G., Punjab, for the State.
RANJIT SINGH, J.
Counsel for the petitioner pleads no instructions in the
case.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for non-
prosecution.
(RANJIT SINGH ) JUDGE
November 08, 2012 khurmi
Sukhblas Singh
Financial Commissioner (Appeals-I), Punjab, Chandigarh
Ranjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
