The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner had expired and his legal representatives were unresponsive to communications regarding their appearance on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No. 18940 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision : 23.08.2012
Makhan Singh
... Petitioner
vs
The Punjab State Federation of Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd. and others
..Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
Present: Mr. Arun Abrol, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate for respondents No. 1 to 3.
Rajesh Bindal, J.
The petitioner in the present petition has expired on 04.12.2010. Ever since then learned counsel for the petitioner is seeking adjournment for bringing his LRs on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that despite number of communications to the LRs of the deceased-petitioner, they are not responding.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
23.08.2012
sharmila
Makhan Singh
The Punjab State Federation of Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd. and others
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
