Parminder Brar v. Punjabi University, Patiala and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Writ Petition dismissed for non-prosecution. The petitioner was absent, and the required first information report copy was not filed by the direction date.
Civil Writ Petition dismissed for non-prosecution. The petitioner was absent, and the required first information report copy was not filed by the direction date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.17628 of 2007 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: October 09, 2012
Parminder Brar
…..Petitioner
versus
Punjabi University, Pathaia
.....Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, JUDGE
Present: None for the petitioner
A.K. SIKRI, C.J. : (Oral)
This case was adjourned sine die on 21.11.2007 with a direction to counsel for the petitioner to file true copy of first information report. Needful has not been done till date. Nobody is present for the petitioner.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
( A.K. SIKRI ) CHIEF JUSTICE
October 09, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) pc JUDGE
Parminder Brar
Punjabi University, Pathaia
A.K. Sikri
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court