The High Court dismissed the writ petition for default on the ground that the petitioner did not appear when the matter was called for hearing after service of notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.14560 of 1997(O&M) Date of Decision: 30.10.2012
Manohar Lal resident of Bhaini Badshahpur, Teh. Barwalal Distt. Hisar.
... Petitioner
Versus
The Haryana State Electricity Board, Shakti Bhawan, Sector-6, Panchkula through its Chairman and another.
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
Present:None.
K. KANNAN, J. (Oral)
On 30.03.1998, a Division Bench of this Court had adjourned the case sine die allowing the case to be listed for hearing when the counsel made an application. The case has been listed after service of notice to the counsel for the petitioner. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called.
The writ petition is dismissed for default.
30th October, 2012 ( K. KANNAN ) Rajan JUDGE
Manohar Lal
The Haryana State Electricity Board
K. KANNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
