Single judge dismissed the writ petition as it was not complied with a previous direction to place on record the claim statement and reply before the Labour Court.
The writ petition is dismissed for non-compliance with previous directions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 13656 of 2004 Date of decision September 12, 2012
Anil Kumar
....... Petitioners
Versus
Presiding Officer and others
........ Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
Present:Mr. N. P. Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
K. Kannan, J (oral).
had given a direction to the petitioner to place on record the claim statement preferred by the petitioner before the Labour Court and the reply filed thereto. This was a manner of ascertaining the basis of the respective petitioner's claim. There has been no compliance of the directions given by this Court. The counsel who had appeared on behalf of the petitioner earlier says that he has no instructions.
grounds mentioned above.
(K. KANNAN) JUDGE
September 12, 2012 archana
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be allowed in the absence of compliance with earlier court directions regarding record of claim statement
Whether the matter should be referred to reporters for publication in the judicial digest
Anil Kumar
Presiding Officer and others
K. KANNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
