The High Court disposed of a writ petition regarding the report of a Ziledar concerning water course A.B. based on a compromise where the water course was carved out and not revived.
Writ petition disposed of accordingly based on the compromise.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.12912 of 2011 Date of Decision :25.01.2012
Ram Murti
...Petitioner
Versus
Superintending Canal Officer and Others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH
Present: Mr.Vijay Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Ranvir S.Chaudhan, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
Ms.Harveen Kaur Advocate for
Mr.Gurinder Singh Punia Advocate
for respondents No.3 to 5 & 7.
Respondents No.6 and 8 ex parte. * * *
PARAMJEET SINGH,J.(Oral)
Report by Ziledar, Ziledar Section, Devigarh, District Patiala
has been filed and the same is taken on record.
As per compromise, water course A.B. has been carved out
and the parties are also agreed that dismentaled water course A.B will not be revived.
Disposed of accordingly.
January 25, 2012. seema-II
( PARAMJEET SINGH) JUDGE
Ram Murti
Superintending Canal Officer and Others
PARAMJEET SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
