The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the writ petition as infructuous on the ground that the petitioner had left his job.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No. 8056 of 1997 Date of Decision: January 24, 2012
Dr. Gurjinder Pal Singh
…Petitioner
Versus
The State of Punjab and another.
…Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH
Present: Mr. Manu Bhandari, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ranvir S. Chauhan, DAG, Punjab, for respondent No. 1.
Mr. Saurabh Arora, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Paramjeet Singh, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has left the job, therefore, this petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous.
January 24, 2012 vkd
(Paramjeet Singh) Judge
Dr. Gurjinder Pal Singh
The State of Punjab
Paramjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
