The petition was disposed of orders of even date passed in CWP No. 11328 of 2009. No substantive content for summary beyond this procedural disposition.
Not mentioned; order follows a separate judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
__*
CWP No. 12810 of 2007 Date of decision: October 03, 2012.
M/S Tipson Cycles Pvt. Ltd, Ludhiana Vs. Union of India and others.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.SIKRI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present: Shri S.K.Mukhi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri Akshay Bhan, Advocate, Shri Pankaj Jain, Advocate. Ms. Savita Saxena, Advocate, Sr.Standing counsel for Revenue/Respondent. Shri Yogesh Putney, Advocate, Sr.Standing Counsel for Revenue/ respondent. Shri Vivek Sethi and Shri Rajesh Katoch, Advocate, Standing counsel for Income Tax Department.
A.K.SIKRI, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL)
This petition stands disposed of in terms of the order of even date passed in CWP No. 11328 of 2009 Guru Nanak Exports Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-I, Jalandhar and others.
(A.K.SIKRI) CHIEF JUSTICE
October 03, 2012. m
(RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) JUDGE
M/S Tipson Cycles Pvt. Ltd
Union of India
A.K. SIKRI
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
